To contact us Click HERE
Sam Smith - Reading about the latest example of Barack Obama's narcissism - if Congress doesn't do what I say, I'll just issue executive orders - brought to mind the degree to which folks like me belong to a rapidly disappearing minority: those still believe in tripartite government.
This is no longer even discussed much because those who control the public's eye and ear - the media and the White House - have no interest in the topic. In our grad school autocracy, underlying organizational principles now come more from the Harvard Business School than from the Constitution.
One of the ways that this is defended by those in power is to ridicule those who speak in favor of devolution. To even criticize executive power is to be a member of the Tea Party or some residue from the Civil War south.
This, of course, is nonsense, particularly because - unnoted by either politicians or the media - the Republican Party and southern conservatives actually are helping mightily to strengthen the autocracy and weaken its most potentially most important competitor, the Congress.
If Obama seizes excessive power it will be in no small part thanks to the mess that the GOP has made of Congress' powers to keep the White House in check. The extraordinary abuse of the filibuster and the endless childish antics of Boehner, Cantor et al have all assisted in strengthening the power of the President, both in terms of the law and the public's perception.
To retain any semblance of democracy, and a shared government, you need a functioning, powerful, and rational Congress. Instead the Republicans have drastically weakened the legislative branch giving more power to the very man they claim to hate.
This admittedly is not a new problem, as I wrote about in my book, Shadows of Hope, twenty years ago next fall. But few issues have so affected our government and attracted so little serious discussion as this one.
Sam Smith, Shadows of Hope, 1992 -Thephenomenon of public impatience over the inefficiency and boisterousness ofdemocracy is not new to the Congress nor to legislative councils generally.There is an excessive expectation of legislative deportment usually achievableonly in the most undemocratic, corrupt or autocratic bodies. This public intoleranceof what is often nothing more than healthy confrontation and necessary debatecreates a covert bias towards autocracy-- not for any ideological reason but simply because it seems more orderly andpolite.
Since a tightly run executive can stifle internal debate and present adignified front to the public, whereas Congress is always brushing up againstanarchy and confusion, the White House often finds itself with a sizableadvantage over the legislature. The President, for example, is in a position topresent a “comprehensive” health plan to the Congress; but that plan will haveto be reviewed by several separate and potentially contentious Hill committees.
Thereare other serious handicaps the Congress faces, not the least of which is thegrowing territorial aggression of modern administrations and Congress's limited skill in counteractingit. A particularly striking example is Congress's acceptance of the so-called"black budget" consisting of funding for intelligence agencies, thespecifics of which (in violation of the Constitution) are unknown to most ofthe members.Despitecreation of its own technological and budget oversight agencies, Congress isstill outgunned by the massive complexities of the executive branch. It suffersfrom the transformation of tripartite government into a form of mediarchy withthe president as celebrity-king. It persists in arcane, pompous and pointlessprocedures, many faithfully transmitted to the public by C-SPAN.
The Senatereadily consents, but rarely exercises its constitutional power to advise thepresident on treaties and appointments.
Congress weakens itself by thecorruption it tolerates and the potential this creates for blackmail by theWhite House and federal police agencies. It has largely given up itsbudget powers to the executive. It has drifted into an almost feudal dependencyon the White House for the largesse of federal facilities and programs -- 47states, for example, were on the take for the super-collider program and fourhundred congressional districts got a piece of the B-1 bomber. Further,Congress has long suffered from leadership that is not only politically weakbut stunningly uncharismatic. From constitutional powers to soundbites,Congress comes up short.
... With thebreakdown of the political parties and congressional autocracy, individualmembers of Congress have clearly gained independence, but they lack aconcomitant growth in power. The condition can be described by analogy: if you go to a cathedral you are expected tokeep the silence; if you go to a baseball stadium you may scream at will. Inneither place, however, will your personal views attract much attention.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder